This line accesses the field name's 0th element (which came from the collection) but did not check if the string was empty. I haven't managed to repro this yet, but I believe this is the cause of a recent BF, and it's worth fixing regardless.
- Votes:
-
0 Vote for this issue
- Watchers:
-
5 Start watching this issue
- Created:
- Updated:
- Resolved: