-
Type: Task
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Priority: Major - P3
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Component/s: None
-
5
-
Storage Engines - 2023-01-10, StorEng - 2023-01-24
This ticket comes from this comment written by donald.anderson@mongodb.com.
We start holding mutexes in WT-10238 as we implemented a dynamic set of tables that are created and deleted on the fly.
One suggestion is to use shared mutexes instead of regular ones. This ticket should investigate this, the pros and cons and make any code changes that could be beneficial.