-
Type: Task
-
Resolution: Fixed
-
Priority: Major - P3
-
Affects Version/s: None
-
Component/s: None
-
Storage Engines
-
1
-
Storage Engines - 2022-10-17
This isn't strictly wrong, but it could be clearer.
There are two cases (that I could see, at least) where we initialise a char type with a raw 0, where it should probably be '\0'. It works fine as-is, this is just a clarity improvement.
The two places are coltype in wt_table_check and digit in flcs_modify in test_checkpoint.c.
- related to
-
WT-9857 Audit code: signed-ness of char type differs between x86 and ARM
- Closed